Aptos (APT)

<think> Okay, let's tackle this. The market question is about whether APT or SUI had a larger percentage price change on July 29, 2026. The resolution criteria use CoinGecko's data from the UTC 00:00 open to 23:59 close. Resolver 1 couldn't get the exact CoinGecko data because their historical tables were lagging, but they used other sources like CoinGecko's snapshot and WorldCoinIndex. They found APT had a -2.4% change and SUI -1.2%, so APT's magnitude was higher. Resolver 2 managed to get the exact CoinGecko data. They took the July 28 close as the open for July 29. For APT, that's $0.587759 to $0.564047 close. Calculating ((0.564047 - 0.587759)/0.587759)*100 gives around -4.03%, absolute value 4.03%. For SUI, it's $0.693148 to $0.685550, which is ((0.685550 - 0.693148)/0.693148)*100 ≈ -1.096%, so 1.096% absolute. That's a clear winner for APT. Resolver 1's data is slightly different but both show APT's change was larger. Resolver 2's method seems more accurate since they used the exact CoinGecko data points as per the historical data pages. The agreement between both resolvers suggests confidence. Even though Resolver 1 had to approximate, the direction and relative magnitudes still align. So the answer should be 0. </think> ANSWER: Aptos (APT)

Resolution criteria: - "Aptos (APT)": Wins if the absolute percentage price change of APT/USD on July 29, 2026 (measured from the UTC 00:00 open price to the UTC 23:59 close price) is strictly greater than that of SUI/USD for the same period, as reported by CoinGecko. - "Sui (SUI)": Wins if the absolute percentage price change of SUI/USD on July 29, 2026 (measured from the UTC 00:00 open price to the UTC 23:59 close price) is strictly greater than that of APT/USD for the same period, as reported by CoinGecko. Clarifications: - Percentage price change is calculated as the absolute value of ((close price − open price) / open price) × 100, so both positive and negative moves are compared by magnitude. - If both tokens record identical absolute percentage changes, neither outcome wins; the market is unresolvable.